2012-04-20naturalnews.com

A shocking 88 percent of 53 "landmark" studies on cancer that have been published in reputable journals over the years cannot be reproduced, according to the review, which means that their conclusions are patently false.

C. Glenn Begley, a former head of global cancer research at drug giant Amgen and author of the review, was unable to replicate the findings of 47 of the 53 studies he examined. It appears as though researchers are simply fabricating findings that will garner attention and headlines rather than publishing what they actually discover, which helps them to maintain a steady stream of grant funding but deceives the public.

This is sick (no pun intended). It confirms my suspicion on mainstream cancer research in general, which is that it is largely wrong because it intentionally dodges natural-based, non-patentable cures.



Comments: Be the first to add a comment

add a comment | go to forum thread