|
||
Relevant:
|
2011-10-31 — independent.org
``‘For the Berkeley team to have chosen this particular moment to launch a major international publicity blitz is a highly unethical sabotage of the peer review process.' In Prof. Curry's view, two of the papers were not ready to be published, in part because they did not properly address the arguments of climate sceptics. As for the graph disseminated to the media, she said: ‘This is ‘hide the decline' stuff. Our data show the pause, just as the other sets of data do. Muller is hiding the decline.''
source article | permalink | discuss | subscribe by: | RSS | email Comments: Be the first to add a comment add a comment | go to forum thread Note: Comments may take a few minutes to show up on this page. If you go to the forum thread, however, you can see them immediately. |