2010-08-30telegraph.co.uk

Interesting how, like fluoride's commonplace "medical" use today, the use of dangerous uranium and plutonium for civilian power over vastly cleaner thorium was spurred by the need to create weapons of mass destruction.

Thorium is so common that miners treat it as a nuisance, a radioactive by-product if they try to dig up rare earth metals. The US and Australia are full of the stuff. So are the granite rocks of Cornwall. You do not need much: all is potentially usable as fuel, compared to just 0.7pc for uranium.

After the Manhattan Project, US physicists in the late 1940s were tempted by thorium for use in civil reactors. It has a higher neutron yield per neutron absorbed. It does not require isotope separation, a big cost saving. But by then America needed the plutonium residue from uranium to build bombs.



Comments: Be the first to add a comment

add a comment | go to forum thread