FAQ  |  Search  |  Memberlist  |  Usergroups   |  Register  |  Profile  |  Log in to check your private messages  |  Log in 

 Mass Joinder Lawsuit- Kramer & Kaslow View next topic
View previous topic



Post new topicThis topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
Author Message
achtung
Nitroglycerin


Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Posts: 716
Location: Germany

Re: Mass Joinder Lawsuit- Kramer & Kaslow
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2011 2:44 am Reply with quoteBack to top

This mass joinder suit seems to be a fraud.

It is the result of the modification Scamsters just wanting to bilk the public of more money, without doing a thing.

Kaslow and Kramer are listed by the Better Business Bureau (BBB) as having a grade of F (for failure) because they did not do what they promised, and refused to honor refund agreements to clients. (don't believe me, talk to the BBB.)

As to the shills that are promoting the Mass Joinder, if they are not a California Supreme Court authorized Lawyer referral service, They ARE breaking the law. One cannot herd clients in the state of California. Nor can an attorney ACCEPT clients known to be herded. (Rule 1-320 in case you are interested in looking it up)

As to the upfront fees. Unless the fees are called "retainer" upfront, and listed as non refundable, they must by California Law be segregated into separate accounts and accounted for.
(and no, it does not cost 5 grand to be added (joinder) to a mass joinder suit.

AS to Mass litigation Alliance. They are run by an attorney (Davis). What does Davis get out of the arrangement? What is disclosed? How is Davis compensated?
Why was MLA and Davis said to not be associated with K&K and now they are the only "authorized" intake company?

_________________
“Debt and deficits are not inventions of ideology. They are facts of arithmetic.”

– Paul Martin
View user's profileSend private message
Do_the_math
The WhistleBlower


Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 2564
Location: Groovy Town

Re: Mass Joinder Lawsuit- Kramer & Kaslow
PostPosted: Sat Feb 26, 2011 3:31 am Reply with quoteBack to top

Icantseeyou, what happened to your attempted smear campaign against me on the Loansafe.org thread for posting on a website that had Google Ads? I'm still struggling to keep a straight face on that one.

Achtung knows what he is talking about, and you, sir, are a shill.

_________________
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." -Albert Einstein

http://contributor.yahoo.com/u.....ailey.html
View user's profileSend private message
Do_the_math
The WhistleBlower


Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 2564
Location: Groovy Town

Re: Mass Joinder Lawsuit- Kramer & Kaslow
PostPosted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 8:22 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

For those of you not following the discussion on this company on the Mandelman Matters discussion thread, please check out the latest:

http://implode-explode.com/for.....622#326622

This is a response to a post that was made this morning:

Boston67 wrote:
Fresh from the press Smile

Philip Kramer and Mass Litigation Alliance do not speak with Mr. Stein’s authority, but have potentially either misrepresented or misunderstood the facts. Please look at exhibit A, where I have highlighted certain parts that clearly substantiate my claims.

Exhibit A - http://www.johnwrightvsbofa.co.....script.pdf

Exhibit B - This is the Twitter on Mr. Stein’s page that states:
"Imposters of the Doberman are out there, have been reported to the Authorities, and I will be shutting them down this week."
Fact. 11:45 PM Feb 26th via web - http://twitter.com/MJSAssociat.....5853223936


You forgot to post a link to John Wright's story. Let me help you out by providing a link:

http://www.piggybankblog.com/2.....daily-blo/

Here is an interesting quote:

Quote:
Our protest against K2 law and Mass Litigation Alliance was sparked by an anonymous tip. This anonymous tip submitted websites, documents and information for us to evaluate, but also warned us that the Wright Vs. BofA lawsuit might be in danger. Considering that many people sometimes try to exploit the piggybankblog platform, by submitting things anonymously, the board researched these claims, and was able to determine that there was validity to such claims, after reading this press release:

http://www.prweb.com/releases/.....128061.htm

The press release included a link at the bottom of page: http://www.kramer-kaslow.com. When we first viewed this link, if just had a “Warning” flashing on the right hand side of page, which would take you to a page full of cease and desist letters.


And here is another interesting quote:

Quote:
At any rate, our board did review the kramer-kaslow site, but we became extremely suspicious, after we noticed that the page changed some days later. It seemed to be a bait and switch tactic of some kind, because now the page clearly seemed to have a company listed as a Kramer and Kaslow approved “intake partner,” that potentially had risen out of the ashes of K2 law, who was one of the firms a cease and desist letter was sent to. Huh!? At any rate, this is what it said:

Mass Litigation Alliance, A Professional Corporation, (MLA,pc) is the National Intake partner for all Mass Joinder Litigations. Philip A Kramer serves in an of counsel capacity to MLA,pc

Considering that I had evidence that suggested that Philip Kramer did not have Mr. Stein’s authority to appoint intake partners for either the Ronald Vs. BofA or the Wright Vs. BofA lawsuit, I contacted another source, who then gave me another page to post that reflected what I had seen when the press release was first done, which did not have Mass Litigation Alliance on it-http://www.kramerkaslowpc.com/ This is because I was interested in protecting the public from such potentially deceptive advertising, while I knew that Mr. Stein had not given Mr. Kramer this kind of authority.

Before: http://www.kramerkaslowpc.com/

After: http://www.kramer-kaslow.com/news.html

With that being said, there was a comment left from someone from the Loan Safe site, who seemed to think that I should be embarrassed, simply because they were the brain surgeon that realized that I changed the link, while she stated that the original one displayed that Mass Litigation Alliance was an approved intake partner, and she did not realize that it said this only after the change. Her screen name is “Do The Math,” but obviously she was missing a very important part of the equation, which is why I rather refer to her as “Did Not Do The Math Right.” If “Did Not Do The Math Right” had been paying attention, she might have noticed that the Kramer and Kenslow site seemed to have done a bait and switch. I have noticed that “Did Not Do The Math Right” seems to have a potential agenda of trying to discredit me, while she advertises another site.


First off, I will call your attention to the same press release referenced in the blog and posted above which is also on Yahoo:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/prweb/.....8128061_13

Now scroll down to the bottom of the press release, and notice the name Brookstone Law PC. Yes, that is right, Brookstone Law PC issued the press release on Kramer.

Next, I've been following this closely and I saved copies of the websites before and after the changes. The original website was www.kramer-kaslow.com. I noted at least three major changes to this site.

1. The site originally showed two approved intake partners on the warning page, and three approved Of Counsel Firms on the main page. I posted the information on this thread shortly after the site was announced (see first response to this thread- and yes, I did save a copy of this thread). To refresh your memory, here is what I copied and pasted from their website main page:

Quote:
Approved Of Counsel Law Firms

The Law Firms listed below are the solely exclusive law firms working specifically with Kramer & Kaslow. All others are not affiliated. In order to protect your rights and security in this case all matters pursuant to Kramer & Kaslow are only authorized through the law firms below:

Matt Davis Law Firm
Brookstone Law, PC
Mass Litigation Alliance,pc


Shortly after posting this, the site deleted Brookstone Law as well as Hartford Dunn that had been shown as an approved National Intake Partner for Brookstone Law on the warning page. Here is a copy of the original waring page showing Hartford Dunn as an approved intake partner:

Image

Since the parties involved seem to be so fond of press releases, here is an interesting one for you from Hartford Dunn:

http://www.prweb.com/releases/.....149809.htm

Quote:

Quote:
Among Harford Dunn LLP’s outstanding, industry-leading partner attorneys and firms are Brookstone Law, PC, and Lanza & Smith, PLC from California, Guldenschuh & Associates from Georgia, Jon D. Pels, Esq., Lawrence J. Anderson, Esq., Justin M. Reiner, Esq. and Jennifer Schiffer, Esq. from Maryland, Cuneo, Gilbert & LaDuca, LLP from Washington DC, Frydman, LLC and Susan Chana Lask from New York, Cohen & Malad, LLP Class Action Attorneys from Indiana, Law Offices of Christie Arkovich from Florida, Law Offices of Heather Boone McKeever from Kentucky, E. Craig Smay, Esq. & John Christian Barlow from Utah, Friscia & Associates from New Jersey and Lauren Paulson from Oregon.


We'll just file this under "Things that make you go hmmmm..." and move on.

2. After this information was released and the www.kramer-kaslow.com site was changed to remove Brookstone Law PC (and link to the website) and Hartford Dunn, John Wright released the story about Mass Litigation Alliance not being authorized and being behind the K2 law scandal. With this came a new website: www.kramerkaslowpc.com. While Mass Litigation Alliance was removed from the warning page as an approved intake partner, Matt Davis was still listed as an approved Of Counsel Law firm on the main page. Doh!

Here is a copy to refresh your memory:

Image

3. The fact that John Wright is aware of the issue that Kramer is not authorized by Stein and he didn't just come out and report that particular fact is disconcerting. John Wright failed to report that not only were the firms listed on Kramer and Kaslow's site not authorized, but KRAMER HIMSELF WAS NOT AUTHORIZED!

4. Why didn't Mr. Stein issue Cease & Desist letters himself and post them to his own website warning consumers that Kramer is not authorized? Nothing in the Cease & Desist letters provides consumers with any type of warning to this fact, and the address listed to surrender all materials and clients names (including Mr. Stein) go to Kramer's address.

Guess we should file all of this under "Things that make you go hmmmm..."

_________________
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." -Albert Einstein

http://contributor.yahoo.com/u.....ailey.html
View user's profileSend private message
Display posts from previous:      
Post new topicThis topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.


 Jump to:   


Merge topics 

View next topic
View previous topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB 2.0.22-2 (Debian) © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group :: FI Theme :: All times are GMT